Chatbot Laws Which laws apply?

Texas / AI disclosure

HB 149

Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA): Relating to regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems in this state; providing civil penalties

In effectSince Jan. 1, 2026

Chatbot Laws · verified Oct. 21, 2026

Texas's broad AI governance act contains one conversation-related duty: a governmental agency that offers an AI system intended to interact with consumers must tell each consumer, before or at the time of interaction, that they are dealing with AI, even if that is obvious. Health care providers using AI in a service or treatment must give a similar disclosure.

Who must comply

Governmental agencies that make an AI system available to interact with consumers (Texas-resident individuals acting in a personal or household context), and providers of health care services who use an AI system in relation to a service or treatment. The chapter itself uses the term 'governmental agency' in § 552.051(b) but defines 'governmental entity' in § 552.001, which excludes hospital districts and public institutions of higher education.

What it requires

AI disclosureA governmental agency that makes available an AI system intended to interact with consumers must disclose to each consumer, before or at the time of interaction, that they are interacting with AI, even if it would be obvious. The disclosure must be clear and conspicuous, in plain language, and free of dark patterns, and may be given through a hyperlink to a separate web page.When: Before or at the time of interaction§ 552.051(b)-(e)
Other dutiesIf an AI system is used in relation to a health care service or treatment, the provider must give the same disclosure to the recipient or the recipient's personal representative no later than the date the service or treatment is first provided, or as soon as reasonably possible in an emergency.§ 552.051(f)

Enforcement

Enforced byAttorney General (exclusive)§§ 552.101(a)-(b), 552.104, 552.105
Private lawsuitsNo
PenaltiesUncured violations: $10,000 to $12,000 for each curable violation (or breach of a cure statement); $80,000 to $200,000 for each uncurable violation; $2,000 to $40,000 per day for a continued violation. The Attorney General may also seek an injunction and attorney's fees and costs.
Cure period60 days after the Attorney General's written notice of violation; no action may be brought before the 60th day, or at all if the violation is cured and a written statement is provided within that time.

Key dates

  1. Whole Act takes effect

Sources

  1. History for 89(R) HB 149, Texas Legislature Online Supports: signed 06/22/2025, effective 1/1/26, vote history.
  2. HB 149 enrolled text, Texas Legislature Online Supports: §§ 551.001, 552.001, 552.051, 552.101-552.105, Sec. 10 effective date.
  3. Business and Commerce Code chapter 552, Texas Constitution and Statutes Supports: Sections added by Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1174 (H.B. 149).
  4. HB 149, Legislative Reference Library of Texas Supports: Chapter 1174 and bill history.

Questions

When does Texas HB 149 take effect?

January 1, 2026: Whole Act takes effect. It is in effect as of November 4, 2026.

Who does Texas HB 149 apply to?

Governmental agencies that make an AI system available to interact with consumers (Texas-resident individuals acting in a personal or household context), and providers of health care services who use an AI system in relation to a service or treatment. The chapter itself uses the term 'governmental agency' in § 552.051(b) but defines 'governmental entity' in § 552.001, which excludes hospital districts and public institutions of higher education.

Who enforces Texas HB 149?

Attorney General (exclusive). Penalties: Uncured violations: $10,000 to $12,000 for each curable violation (or breach of a cure statement); $80,000 to $200,000 for each uncurable violation; $2,000 to $40,000 per day for a continued violation. The Attorney General may also seek an injunction and attorney's fees and costs.

Can people sue under Texas HB 149?

No. It does not create a private right to sue; enforcement is by Attorney General (exclusive).